How Old Were The Disciples?

I always assumed that the disciples were older. The movies and paintings I saw as a child showed them as father figures. But, the question How Old Were the Disciples? opens the door to a fascinating truth about Christ’s earliest followers.

The Bottom Line

There are compelling reasons to believe that most of the disciples were actually teenagers during the years of Jesus’ ministry.

A black and white painting of the aged faces of the eleven remaining disciples.

I love exploring questions like this one about the disciples, where the Bible does not give us an explicit answer. Analyzing scripture in context can reveal interesting clues to the answer, just as with Mary’s age. And, the process of exploring and interpreting the Bible with a question in mind grows my faith.

How Old Were the Disciples, Really?

There are many scriptural and contextual clues that help us to answer this question of the disciples age with a degree of authority. And, while I can’t determine their exact ages, I can safely say that they were mostly teenagers.

In the interest of brevity and saving you time, I will only provide a brief synopsis of each reason, here. If you want more info, be sure to check out the linked articles.

Reasons To Believe They Were Teenagers

  • Jesus told Peter to pay the temple tax for just the two of them.
    The temple tax was required of Jewish men, twenty years and older. But, Jesus instructed Peter in Matthew 17:24-27 to pay it only for the two of them, noticeably excluding the other eleven.
  • Only Peter had a wife in the gospels (Matt 8:14). The others wed later.
    There were clear cultural norms for marriage in antiquity. This makes the absence of wives stand out. Paul’s reference in 1 Cor 9:5 suggests that the others were younger, as they eventually wed.
  • The cultural context for discipleship affirms their youth.
    Disciples were typically chosen in their teens, after basic religious education but before becoming fully established. Rabbis invested in students who were still formable, not men already anchored by careers, households, and status.
  • The mother of James and John appealed to Jesus on their behalf.
    Grown men did not need their mother to advocate publicly (Matthew 20:20-28) on their behalf. Her involvement makes more sense, if James and John had not yet established households of their own.
  • No one referred to the disciples as presbuteros until after Acts.
    Presbuteros means an elder. The Bible commonly applies the term to leaders of the early church, but always in reference to older men. Its absence here suggests they were still younger, even as they grew into leadership roles.

The Aging of the Apostles

Don’t worry, if you’re confused by the claim that the disciples were teenagers. I was, too. The aging of the apostles has been happening for a very long time. Media portrayals consistently place them beyond what the biblical context suggests.

Consider the depictions of the Last Supper by Davinci, and in the Monreale Cathedral mosaics. They were created hundreds of years ago, but just look at the apostles. Some of them are shown as the grey haired elders of Christ.

Why would artists render the disciples this way?

  • We have pretty big spoilers about who the Twelve eventually became.
  • We tend to associate leadership and spiritual maturity with greater age.
  • Many works are designed to evoke a sense of their later apostolic authority.

The Chosen television series portrays the disciples as roughly the same age as Jesus. While this is closer to reality, it also points to a modern reason why we tend to imagine the apostles as older than they were.

  • A grown Jesus recruiting teenage boys to leave their homes and follow him would probably feel unsettling to a modern audience.

All that to say, it’s entirely understandable that we picture the apostles as older. We see them through the lens of who they became. And, age feels like a natural companion to such wisdom, faith, and authority.

But Jesus met them as he meets us all, before their experience with him could form and shape them. We must hold space for the reality of who they were in the Gospels. It deepens the reading. It reminds us that God works patiently through those of us who are still growing into who He wants us to be.

Application for Today

If the disciples were indeed younger than we imagine, then there is at least one lesson we can learn for today. Youth is not a liability to be overcome. It is the place where transformation begins.

I have been guilty of approaching the youth in my church from the perspective that they are children in need of feeding. Perhaps this is not the worst thing, as Jesus did instruct Peter, that if he loved Him, then he should feed and tend to his lambs.

But, God chose and prepared many of the greatest Christian thinkers and evangelists for ministry during their period of adolescence. They went on to do incredible things. Adolescent callings appear in the Biblical narratives, as well.

So, today I am considering the following:

  1. What could I do to better equip my children to follow Jesus as adults?
  2. Do I listen like Jesus would, as they discuss and share their thoughts on faith?
  3. Am I prepared to respect them as the next generation of adult leaders?

More on the Disciples

Comments

3 responses to “How Old Were The Disciples?”

  1. Joel Daniels Avatar
    Joel Daniels

    Hi Karl,

    Thank you for putting together your list of arguments in favor of the disciples being teenagers. Personally, I think the strongest biblical evidence you listed was the reference in I Corinthians 9:6. Since the brothers of Jesus were younger than Jesus but eventually married, it also follows that the disciples of Jesus who were eventually married were quite possibly also younger than Jesus.
    Assuming they were teenagers, however, it seems odd to my mind that Jesus would have used a teenaged treasurer (Judas), a teenaged Zealot (Simon, a would-be assassin), and a teenaged tax collector (Levi Matthew–did Rome employ such young Jews for such a treacherous task?). Would you care to respond to that? Truly, I have no historical evidence to suggest that teenagers would not be used in such contexts, but I wondered if you had studied those professions at all.

    Again, great post. Thank you for sharing!

    Joel Daniels

    1. Karl McGinnis Avatar

      I appreciate your response, Joel. Thank you for reading, and for the challenging question. Regarding Matthew, I have to admit that he is one of the more difficult disciples for me to view as a teenager. However, it is likely that he was not a Publican as we commonly envision the position.

      This article by Dr. Leonhard Schmitz (https://tinyurl.com/Schmitz2) explains that at the time of Christ, Publicani were Roman citizens of pretty high rank (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equites). The Roman government sold the right to tax for a fixed sum up front, and these associations who purchased the right to levy the taxes profited greatly. It seems exceedingly unlikely that Matthew was a Roman citizen of such significance.

      Professor Ramsay makes the following observation in A Manual of Roman Antiquities (https://tinyurl.com/ManualofRomanAntiquities pg 238)
      “To farm the Revenues, or even a portion of the Revenues, of a large Province, required an immense establishment of slaves and subordinates of every kind, as well as vast warehouses for storing, and fleets of merchantmen for transporting from place to place, the produce collected.”

      https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/tax-gatherers discusses the difference between mokheshim and gabba’im, which seems to fit in with the historical narrative. It also mentions the confusion between publicani and “publican”. And, it appears to be a credible source. But, I did not find other Hebrew or English sources to corroborate the terms mokhesh (assuming it is מוכש “to be bitten, to be stung”), and gabba (גבא “(obsolete) collector of dues”). That said, there is a possible clue within the Bible itself regarding his position, as there is a difference in the title accorded Matthew and (telones) and the one given to Zacchaeus as chief tax collector (architelones).

      All that to say that I think it is possible that a junior tax collector could have indeed been a young man/teenager, working for an older Jewish man (similar to Zacchaeus in Jericho).

      I cannot find anything regarding the age of Simon, or surrounding the recruiting/training practices of “the zealots”. The “fourth faction” as detailed by Josephus doesn’t seem to be an especially cohesive group prior to Jesus as pretty much any groups who opposed Rome with direct action seem to have been labeled “zealots”. Perhaps he belonged to one of these groups, perhaps he simply ascribed to their ideology enough to get the nickname.

      Judas is worth a whole post. He’s so fascinating to me. But to answer this specific question, I don’t think the scriptures reveal that he had any particular skills, experience, or character attributes which would have qualified him to be the treasurer for Jesus’ earthly ministry. In fact, John 12:6 goes so far as to accuse him of stealing from the money box. So, I don’t this his role in the ministry should have much bearing on our understanding of his age.

  2. Carol Avatar
    Carol

    Karl,
    Thank you for this interesting article. I would say either or. As I’m reading your words what comes to mind is the verse where his disciples are trying to shush away the little children and Christ said to them suffer the little children unto me. If they were younger why would they not want these little children to go to Christ?
    Children kind of like take care of their own.
    I enjoyed the perspective thank you

Leave a Reply

Discover more from He Has Changed Me

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading