I have to admit that I used to skim the part in Matthew about Jesus and the Temple Tax because it felt like such a bizarre miracle. A fish with a coin in its mouth? Ok… I guess. But, it turns out, this interaction is actually one of the most compelling reasons to believe that eleven of the twelve disciples were teenagers.
The Bottom Line
All Jewish men over 20 were required to pay the Temple Tax. But, Jesus paid only for himself and Peter. This suggests that the other disciples were younger.
These kinds of questions are so important. Slowly working toward the answer requires patience as we pick our way through tradition, scripture, and our own biases. It’s the same method that I use when making sense of the virgin birth and navigating other difficult challenges.
Relevant Sources on the Temple Tax
“When they came to Capernaum, the collectors of the two-drachma tax went up to Peter and said, “Does your teacher not pay the tax?” He said, “Yes.”
And when he came into the house, Jesus spoke to him first, saying, “What do you think, Simon? From whom do kings of the earth take toll or tax? From their sons or from others?” And when he said, “From others,” Jesus said to him, “Then the sons are free.
However, not to give offense to them, go to the sea and cast a hook and take the first fish that comes up, and when you open its mouth you will find a shekel. Take that and give it to them for me and for yourself.”
Matthew 17:24-27 ESV
Exodus 30:11-16 Sets up a half-shekel tax, required of all males 20+ years old.
Mishnah Shekalim 1:3 This rabbinic source clarifies that the courts could seize collateral from those who did not pay the tax.
Cultural Context of the Tax
The key thing to understand here is that the there was a rigid structure of taxation in the Second Temple system. The money was used in the service of the temple, for its upkeep. But, these were not simply offerings, as we make them.
This tax was not optional. The law required all adult Jewish men to pay it to remain in good legal standing. But, Jesus instructed Peter to pay it for the two of them, notably excluding the other eleven.
The math checks out. The tax was a half shekel (two drachma), collected as part of the annual census. And, Peter pulled exactly one shekel from the fish.
Early Church Fathers on This Passage
“Our Lord was the son of a king both according to the flesh and according to the spirit, begotten either from the stock of David or from the Word of the almighty Father. Therefore as the son of a king he did not owe tax, but as one who had assumed the humility of the flesh he has to fulfill all justice.
We unfortunates, who are enrolled under Christ’s name and do nothing worthy of such great majesty, for us he both underwent the cross and paid our tax. But we do not pay him tribute in return for his honor and like the sons of a king we are immune from taxes.” Jerome
Personal Opinion
This text was the turning point for me in dismantling my preconceptions about the age of the disciples. Unsettling, to say the least. But, now that I read the disciples with the proper age, the story feels so much more real.
Teenage disciples explain so many dynamics that otherwise feel strange. Their impulsiveness, ambition, fear, and need for guidance makes more sense. I don’t read them as impetuous adults anymore. I see them as young men, growing up.
I must acknowledge that a small bit of uncertainty remains. The other disciples are not explicitly present with Jesus and Peter in this exchange. However, the very next passage begins with the disciples asking Jesus a question. So, it seems unlikely that just the two of them were present.
Conclusion
When read in its cultural setting, the verses on Jesus and the Temple tax strongly suggest that the disciples were not all adults. The conclusion flows naturally from Jewish law, rooted in the Hebrew scriptures. It is not a creative speculation.
Seeing the disciples as teenagers does not diminish their calling. It magnifies Jesus’ vision. It also humanizes the formation process we see unfolding in the Gospels.
Practical Application
Does it matter how old they were? I think that it does. We should be on guard against our biases when interpreting scripture. Otherwise, we risk allowing media portrayals and cultural narratives to skew what the Bible actually says.
Some questions to consider:
- What assumptions do I bring to the text when you read scripture?
- Is familiarity dampening my curiosity when reading the Bible?
- Am I confusing tradition or imagination with interpretation?
Leave a Reply